recombination human resistin (PeproTech)
Structured Review

Recombination Human Resistin, supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombination human resistin/product/PeproTech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Low‐Frequency Cyclic Stretch Upregulates the Expression of Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2‐Related Factor 2 in Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells to Inhibit the Resistin‐Induced Interleukin‐20 Expression"
Article Title: Low‐Frequency Cyclic Stretch Upregulates the Expression of Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2‐Related Factor 2 in Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells to Inhibit the Resistin‐Induced Interleukin‐20 Expression
Journal: JOR Spine
doi: 10.1002/jsp2.70040
Figure Legend Snippet: Induction of IL‐20 expression in NP cells by resistin stimulation. RNA samples were isolated at the indicated time points or doses and subjected to real‐time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Data are presented as fold changes in fluorescent density from control NP cells (CL) normalized to 18S rRNA level (A, B). The IL‐20 protein in conditioned media was detected by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (C, D). NP cells were kept as controls (CL) or stimulated with 50 ng/mL resistin for the times indicated (C), or the cells were stimulated with resistin at various doses for 4 h (D). Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05 versus control NP cells (CL).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Isolation, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Control, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: p38 MAPK and Akt pathways are required for resistin‐induced expression of IL‐20. (A, B) NP cells were kept as control (CL) or stimulated with 50 ng/mL resistin for 2 h (A) and 4 h (B). Before being kept as CL or stimulated with resistin, NP cells were pretreated with PD98059 (PD), SP600125 (SP), SB203580 (SB), or LY294002 (LY) individually for 1 h. (A) RNA was isolated and subjected to real‐time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Data are presented as fold changes in fluorescent density from control NP cells (CL) normalized to 18S rRNA level. (B) The IL‐20 protein secretion in conditioned media was determined by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. The results are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean. * p < 0.05 versus CL. # p < 0.05 versus vehicle control (dimethyl sulfoxide) with resistin stimulation. (C) NP cells were employed as CL or stimulated with resistin for the durations indicated, and p38 and Akt phosphorylations were determined by Western blotting.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Isolation, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Induction of NF‐kB‐p65 activity by resistin stimulation in NP cells. (A) IL‐20 mRNA expression levels were determined in NP cells pretreated with vehicle (DMSO) or SN50, or transfected with control siRNA (si‐CL) or si‐p65, and then stimulated with 50 ng/mL resistin for 2 h. RNA samples were isolated and subjected to real‐time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Data are presented as fold changes in fluorescent density from control NP cells (CL) normalized to 18S rRNA level. (B, C) The NF‐kB p65 activation was determined by a transcription factor (TF)‐enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. (B) NP cells were employed as control (CL) or stimulated with resistin for the durations indicated. (C) NP cells were pretreated individually with PD98059 (PD), SP600125 (SP), SB203580 (SB), or LY294002 (LY) for 1 h before being used as controls (CL) or stimulated with 50 ng/mL resistin for 1 h. NF‐κB p65 activity was then analyzed. All bar graphs represent folds of CL NP cells, mean ± standard error of the mean. * p < 0.05 versus CL. # p < 0.05 versus DMSO or si‐CL under resistin stimulation.
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Expressing, Transfection, Control, Isolation, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Activation Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Blockade of TLR4 activity inhibited resistin‐induced IL‐20 expression. NP cells were kept as controls (CL), or pretreated with isotype‐matched IgG (Ab‐IgG) and specific TLR4 neutralizing antibody (Ab‐TLR4), or transfected with the control siRNA (si‐CL) and si‐TLR4, and subsequently stimulated with resistin for 2 h (A) and 1 h (B). (A) IL‐20 mRNA levels were determined through real‐time PCR in NP cells and normalized to 18S rRNA. (B) The activation of NF‐kB‐p65 in NP cells after resistin stimulation was analyzed using transcription factor (TF) ELISA. All bar graphs represent folds of control NP cells (CL), mean ± standard error of the mean. * p < 0.05 versus CL NP cells. # p < 0.05 versus IgG‐pretreated or si‐CL‐transfected NP cells under resistin stimulation.
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Expressing, Transfection, Control, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Activation Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Pre‐exposure of NP cells to 5% cyclic stretch with 0.1 Hz for 30 min inhibited resistin‐induced IL‐20 expression. Static NP cells were stimulated with resistin without prestretching (static). NP cells were kept as controls (CL) or pre‐exposed to cyclic stretch at 5% with 0.1 Hz for the indicated durations followed by resistin stimulation. (A) The mRNA levels of IL‐20 in NP cells were determined through real‐time polymerase chain reaction and normalized to 18S rRNA. * p < 0.05 versus CL NP cells. ** p < 0.05 versus static NP cells with resistin stimulation. # p < 0.05 versus resistin‐treated NP cells with cyclic stretch at 5% with 0.1 Hz for 10' and 1 h. (B) The phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and Akt was determined by Western blotting. (C) NF‐kB‐p65 activation in NP cells after 1 h resistin stimulation was analyzed by TF‐ELISA. All bar graphs represent folds of control NP cells (CL), mean ± standard error of the mean. * p < 0.05 versus CL NP cells. # p < 0.05 versus static NP cells with resistin stimulation.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Phospho-proteomics, Western Blot, Activation Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Upregulation of NRF2 inhibited resistin‐induced IL‐20 expression in NP cells. (A) NP cells were used as static control (static) or exposed to 5% with 0.1 Hz cyclic stretch for 30 min or 2 h. The expression of NRF2 in the nucleus was determined by Western blotting. (B–D) NP cells were used as static control (static), or pre‐exposed to 5% with 0.1 Hz for 30 min, and then treated with resistin (50 ng/mL) for 2 h (B), 30 min (C), and 1 h (D). Prior to cyclic stretch exposure, NP cells were transfected with the control siRNA (si‐CL) or si‐NRF2. (B) The levels of IL‐20 mRNA in NP cells were determined through real‐time polymerase chain reaction and normalized to 18S rRNA. (C) The phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, and Akt was determined by Western blotting. (D) NF‐kB‐p65 activation in NP cells was analyzed by TF‐ELISA. All bar graphs represent the percentage of static NP cells (static), mean ± standard error of the mean. * p < 0.05 versus static NP cells.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Western Blot, Transfection, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Phospho-proteomics, Activation Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Schematic representation of the signaling pathways regulating 5% with 0.1 Hz cyclic stretch‐induced NRF2 expression and consequent inhibition of resistin effect in human NP cells.
Techniques Used: Protein-Protein interactions, Expressing, Inhibition

![Effects <t>of</t> <t>recombinant</t> human <t>resistin</t> (0.1, 1, 10, and 100 ng/ml) on steroid hormone (i.e., progesterone [P4], androstendione [A4], testosterone [T], and estradiol [E2]) secretion in culture medium from A) small, B) medium and C) large ovarian follicles. ELISA experiments were performed three independent times. In each experiment six ovaries from three different animals were selected. Data were plotted as mean±S.E.M. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among groups ( P < 0.05).](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_5660/pmc03665660/pmc03665660__1477-7827-11-45-2.jpg)